Search Preview
OpenStack LBAASv2 failed connection debugging | Funky Penguin
funkypenguin.co.nzI deployed Load-Balancer-As-A-Service (LBAAS) in my lab OpenStack deployment early on, and it worked (setup in Horizon) as advertised (load-balancing inbound HTTP connections to multiple docker swarm nodes), until I broke the stack by fiddling with MTU settings.
.co.nz > funkypenguin.co.nz
SEO audit: Content analysis
Language | Error! No language localisation is found. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | OpenStack LBAASv2 failed connection debugging | Funky Penguin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text / HTML ratio | 34 % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frame | Excellent! The website does not use iFrame solutions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flash | Excellent! The website does not have any flash contents. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keywords cloud | security group Skip LBAAS HTTP load applying groups balancer OpenStack working ingress permitting source IP single instances time pool mining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keywords consistency |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Headings |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Images | We found 2 images on this web page. |
SEO Keywords (Single)
Keyword | Occurrence | Density |
---|---|---|
security | 8 | 0.40 % |
group | 7 | 0.35 % |
Skip | 4 | 0.20 % |
LBAAS | 4 | 0.20 % |
HTTP | 4 | 0.20 % |
load | 4 | 0.20 % |
applying | 3 | 0.15 % |
groups | 3 | 0.15 % |
balancer | 3 | 0.15 % |
OpenStack | 3 | 0.15 % |
working | 3 | 0.15 % |
ingress | 3 | 0.15 % |
permitting | 3 | 0.15 % |
source | 2 | 0.10 % |
IP | 2 | 0.10 % |
single | 2 | 0.10 % |
instances | 2 | 0.10 % |
time | 2 | 0.10 % |
pool | 2 | 0.10 % |
mining | 2 | 0.10 % |
SEO Keywords (Two Word)
Keyword | Occurrence | Density |
---|---|---|
security group | 5 | 0.25 % |
Skip to | 3 | 0.15 % |
group permitting | 3 | 0.15 % |
load balancer | 3 | 0.15 % |
to the | 3 | 0.15 % |
security groups | 3 | 0.15 % |
of my | 2 | 0.10 % |
vip_port_id belonging | 2 | 0.10 % |
instances were | 2 | 0.10 % |
applying a | 2 | 0.10 % |
a single | 2 | 0.10 % |
single security | 2 | 0.10 % |
Funky Penguin | 2 | 0.10 % |
belonging to | 2 | 0.10 % |
source IP | 2 | 0.10 % |
mining pool | 2 | 0.10 % |
a security | 2 | 0.10 % |
with my | 2 | 0.10 % |
group to | 2 | 0.10 % |
for a | 2 | 0.10 % |
SEO Keywords (Three Word)
Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
---|---|---|---|
a security group | 2 | 0.10 % | No |
a single security | 2 | 0.10 % | No |
single security group | 2 | 0.10 % | No |
vip_port_id belonging to | 2 | 0.10 % | No |
security group permitting | 2 | 0.10 % | No |
Skip links Skip | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
I know I | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
without applying a | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
before without applying | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
working before without | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
this working before | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
had this working | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
I had this | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
know I had | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Load Balancer Now | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Now I know | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Balancer Now I | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
security group But | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
the Load Balancer | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
to the Load | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
SEO Keywords (Four Word)
Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
---|---|---|---|
a single security group | 2 | 0.10 % | No |
know I had this | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
group But I decided | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
security group But I | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
a security group But | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
applying a security group | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
without applying a security | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
before without applying a | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
working before without applying | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
this working before without | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
had this working before | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
I had this working | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Skip links Skip to | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
But I decided to | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Now I know I | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Balancer Now I know | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Load Balancer Now I | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
the Load Balancer Now | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
to the Load Balancer | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
belonging to the Load | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Internal links in - funkypenguin.co.nz
Archive | Funky Penguin
Contact | Funky Penguin
Search | Funky Penguin
How I removed a file from my git repo history | Funky Penguin
OpenStack LBAASv2 failed connection debugging | Funky Penguin
GPU transcoding with Emby / Plex using docker-nvidia | Funky Penguin
KVM VMs on kernel-2.6.32-696.30.1.el6.x86_64 on AMD-based hypervisor fail to boot | Funky Penguin
Should you do microcode updates? | Funky Penguin
Wife-friendly script to transfer media to USB from linux server | Funky Penguin
What is TurtleCoin and why do I care? | Funky Penguin
Funky Penguin | Upgrading the world through the skilled application of technology
Funky Penguin | Upgrading the world through the skilled application of technology
Funky Penguin | Upgrading the world through the skilled application of technology
Funkypenguin.co.nz Spined HTML
OpenStack LBAASv2 failed connection debugging | Funky Penguin Skip links Skip to primary navigation Skip to content Skip to footer Menu HomeArchiveContactSearchCookbookResumeKitchen Funky Penguin Upgrading the world through the skilled using of technology OpenStack LBAASv2 failed connection debugging David Young 1 min read July 10, 2018 Categories note Tags openstack I deployed Load-Balancer-As-A-Service (LBAAS) in my lab OpenStack deployment early on, and it worked (setup in Horizon) as advertised (load-balancing inbound HTTP connections to multiple docker swarm nodes), until I tapped the stack by fiddling with MTU settings. After this breakage and subsequent repair, the LBAAS didn’t work properly. Assuming it was something I’d messed up with my MTU schenanigans, I ignored it, setup round-robin DNS as a transplanted load balancer, and got on with my day. Looking when now, I remember noticing at the time that a few of my running instances were unreachable, and quickly discovered this was considering they had no security groups applied. Questioning my sanity, I reapplied the intended security groups, and the instances were reachable again. I reasoned that perhaps the dev environment (the unfortunate victim of my learning OpenStack) had somehow been running for some time with security groups disabled, and my recent work had restored correct function. Tonight, working on a recipe for a Masari mining pool, I then banged my throne versus the Docker Swarm “mesh routing” ingress SNAT issue, which obscures the original source IP of all inbound traffic (not unconfined for a mining pool which bans bad/misconfigured miners based on source IP) Knowing that employing LBAAS instead of swarm routing mesh would solve this problem, I started reading up on debugging LBAAS, and stumbled wideness the (linked) instruction to wield a security group to the vip_port_id belonging to the Load Balancer. Now, I know I had this working surpassing without applying a security group. But I decided to test applying a group permitting HTTP ingress to the LB, so I ran neutron port-update --security-group sg_david.http-in c7c997e2-5fb9-4b5f-a6f8-679f3e8483bc. Boom. Inbound HTTP load balancing started working again. Befuddled but happy, I widow flipside security group permitting HTTPS. Again, unconfined success. .. Until I re-tested HTTP, which failed :( It seems as if it’s only possible to socialize a single security group with a vip_port_id belonging to a load balancer. My current solution is to create a single security group, permitting all the ingress ports I need, and applying that group to my load balancer. Share Tweet LinkedIn Reddit Previous GPU transcoding with Emby / Plex using docker-nvidia Next Bookmarks of note / July 23, 2018 Copyright © 2018 Funky Penguin. Site logo penguin icon made by Freepik from Flaticon is licensed by Creative Commons BY 3.0. Made with the Jekyll So Simple theme.